Treat moral law as binding beyond convenience
Do what is right even when expediency, popularity, or private advantage points elsewhere.
An interactive atlas of moral teachings across the world's religious and secular traditions — from ancient scriptures to modern ethics.
Comparative atlas · Original English corpus · Evidence before conclusions
Find a teaching, follow its source anchors, and explore common ground without erasing differences. Every number describes only the systems represented in this edition.
610 teachings found · Edition XXI
Do what is right even when expediency, popularity, or private advantage points elsewhere.
Use reciprocal moral consideration.
Protect the dignity and basic welfare of detained persons.
Do not punish people for unlawful acts that were a direct consequence of being trafficked.
Use hardship as an opportunity for learning, courage, solidarity, and constructive action.
Commit one's moral and spiritual development to the liberation and well-being of others.
Organize inclusive service so aid is available across the whole community or territory.
Do not separate religious belief from concrete acts of justice, service, and care.
Do not separate insight or spiritual attainment from compassionate moral behavior.
Approach ordinary circumstances, hardship, and relationships as opportunities to reduce delusion and deepen compassion.
Maintain accurate measurement and pricing.
When force is permitted, limit it to what is necessary.
Maintain accurate standards in trade and do not manipulate quantity, weight, capacity, or price.
Minimize fear, pain, and distress through competent, appropriate, and regulated methods.
Cultivate emotional discipline and compassion as foundations for nonviolent relationships and institutions.
Apply learning toward healing, justice, and flourishing.
Apply health knowledge for patient welfare and dignity.
Create and choose artistic expression that supports dignity, moral reflection, beauty, and spiritual growth.
Treat authority as responsibility for the common good.
Take proportionate preventive action when credible risks of grave or irreversible climate harm remain scientifically uncertain.
Revise ethical judgments through evidence, critical reflection, open inquiry, and intellectual honesty.
Test inherited claims through thought, evidence, experience, dialogue, and conscience.
Join evidence and critical thinking with compassion for affected persons and sentient beings.
Approach multiple traditions as resources for reconciliation, mutual respect, and common moral action.
FIELD GUIDE · PURPOSE AND BOUNDARIES
World Morals is a source-oriented atlas for readers comparing moral teachings across religious and secular traditions. It provides ways to explore a finite corpus while keeping the difference between a recorded mapping and independently verified evidence visible.
↑ Back to the application
Choose a teaching or a system rather than beginning with a universal conclusion. Read its definition and source basis, then inspect the associated mappings. Open the source and methodology views to understand how a relationship entered the corpus. A label such as official source or specific anchor describes a record’s provenance category; it is not a substitute for reading the cited passage in context.
Use the comparison lab and matrix to formulate questions. Shared mappings may suggest a topic worth investigating, while differences may reflect wording, edition coverage or research gaps. Neither a checked cell nor an empty cell establishes what every adherent believes or how a whole society behaves.
Select a familiar moral theme and compare its records across two systems. Write down the source labels, what has actually been quoted and what remains a summary. Follow the source references before drawing a conclusion. Record a disagreement or missing passage as an open research issue rather than filling the gap with an attractive generalization.
For a classroom discussion, separate three questions: what the dataset records, what a primary text says, and how people interpret or practice it. The atlas directly organizes the first question. The other two need contextual reading, historical scholarship and, where appropriate, the voices of the communities being discussed.
The corpus is an edition with explicit scope and unresolved research statuses. Counts describe records and relationships, not moral superiority, global prevalence or the completeness of a tradition. Geographic and historical displays disclose where research is missing. English source material remains in its original language even when navigation and explanatory interface copy are Spanish.