Disclose when people are interacting with AI
Make users reasonably aware when decisions, communications, or content are generated or materially shaped by AI.
Skip to atlas contentM269 · AI Governance and Information Integrity M271 · AI Governance and Information Integrity M272 · AI Governance and Information Integrity
WORLD MORALS EDITION XXI
Explain consequential automated outcomes
Provide meaningful information enabling affected people to understand and challenge important outcomes.
Comparative atlas · Original English corpus · Evidence before conclusions
A mapping is not a verified quotation. Workbook labels are preserved. An absent mapping does not mean rejection. We do not rank the moral worth of any system.
- Religious systems
- 3/52
- Nonreligious systems
- 2/41
- Represented systems
- 5/93
- Specific anchors*
- 1/5
5.8%
4.9%
5.4%
20.0%
*Calculated from source labels beginning “Specific”; not a count of verified quotations.
Corpus definition
Provide meaningful information enabling affected people to understand and challenge important outcomes.
This is the atlas’s definition, not a substitute for a tradition’s own interpretation. Scope, exceptions and translations require review of each source.
Preserved calculation difference
The original index differs from recomputed unique-system or specific-anchor counts. Both are retained; the source file is unchanged.
All Systems: source 94 · recomputed 93
Overall %: source 5.3 · recomputed 5.3763
Evidence, mapping by mapping
5 selected mappings
Religious Society of Friends - Quaker Ethics · Official framework-level anchor
Explain consequential automated outcomes · System profile
Workbook anchor (not a quotation)
Friends General Conference materials on peace, integrity, equality, simplicity, community, and stewardship
Open original source ↗ www.fgcquaker.org
Official framework-level anchor · Abrahamic / Christian peace tradition
Framework-level mapping: verify exact doctrinal context, institutional authority, historical setting, and scope before formal quotation.
Independent review pending. Edition XXI · Teaching Evidence · row 10147. Source publisher, date, translation and license have not been validated.
Shinnyo-en Buddhist Ethics · Official framework-level anchor
Explain consequential automated outcomes · System profile
Workbook anchor (not a quotation)
Official Shinnyo-en teaching on integrity, meditation, wisdom, compassion, altruism, and Buddha nature
Open original source ↗ shinnyoen.org
Official framework-level anchor · Dharmic / Buddhist
Framework-level mapping: verify exact doctrinal wording, institutional authority, translation, historical context, and scope before formal quotation.
Independent review pending. Edition XXI · Teaching Evidence · row 10148. Source publisher, date, translation and license have not been validated.
Society of Professional Journalists Ethics · Official framework-level anchor
Explain consequential automated outcomes · System profile
Workbook anchor (not a quotation)
SPJ Code of Ethics
Open original source ↗ www.spj.org
Official framework-level anchor · Professional journalism ethics
Framework-level mapping: verify exact article, section, context, and scope before formal quotation.
Independent review pending. Edition XXI · Teaching Evidence · row 10149. Source publisher, date, translation and license have not been validated.
The Salvation Army Christianity · Official framework-level anchor
Explain consequential automated outcomes · System profile
Workbook anchor (not a quotation)
International mission, social justice, governance, and values statements
Open original source ↗ www.salvationarmy.org
Official framework-level anchor · Abrahamic / Christian
Framework-level mapping: verify exact text, doctrinal or institutional authority, historical context, and scope before formal quotation.
Independent review pending. Edition XXI · Teaching Evidence · row 10150. Source publisher, date, translation and license have not been validated.
Trustworthy AI Ethics (UNESCO/OECD) · Specific primary/official anchor
Explain consequential automated outcomes · System profile
Workbook anchor (not a quotation)
OECD transparency and explainability principle
Open original source ↗ oecd.ai
Specific primary/official anchor · Technology and international ethics
Framework-level mappings identify a strong analogue; verify exact text, article, and scope before formal quotation.
Independent review pending. Edition XXI · Teaching Evidence · row 10151. Source publisher, date, translation and license have not been validated.
History and geography: source limits
This edition does not supply a historical genealogy or coordinates for this teaching. Transmission, invention, population and geographic presence are not inferred from a mapping.
Explore connections in the same category
Shared systems in the corpus, not evidence of historical influence.
Maintain human oversight of high-impact systems
Ensure responsible humans can review, override, repair, or stop systems that risk serious harm.
Assess AI risks throughout the lifecycle
Identify, document, mitigate, monitor, and revisit risks from design through retirement.
Unmodified source statistics
| Primary Rank - Religious | 458 |
|---|---|
| Overall Rank | 445 |
| Nonreligious Rank | 381 |
| Religious Frequency Tier | 37 |
| Religions Sharing | 3 |
| Religious Systems | 52 |
| Religious % | 5.8 |
| Nonreligious Groups Sharing | 2 |
| Nonreligious Groups | 41 |
| Nonreligious % | 4.9 |
| All Systems Sharing | 5 |
| All Systems | 94 |
| Overall % | 5.3 |
| Direct Official Anchors | 1 |
| Direct Evidence % | 20 |
| Cross-Sphere Balance Index | 84.5 |
| Religious Adoption Gap | 0.9 |
Specialized or emerging teaching