Hold public safety paramount in technical decisions
Place public safety, health, welfare, and environmental protection above convenience, prestige, or profit.
Explain technological capabilities, consequences, risks, and limitations clearly enough to support informed decisions.
Comparative atlas · Original English corpus · Evidence before conclusions
0.0%
2.4%
1.1%
100.0%
*Calculated from source labels beginning “Specific”; not a count of verified quotations.
Explain technological capabilities, consequences, risks, and limitations clearly enough to support informed decisions.
This is the atlas’s definition, not a substitute for a tradition’s own interpretation. Scope, exceptions and translations require review of each source.
The original index differs from recomputed unique-system or specific-anchor counts. Both are retained; the source file is unchanged.
All Systems: source 94 · recomputed 93
1 selected mappings
Improve public understanding of technology · System profile
IEEE Code of Ethics: improve understanding of technology and its consequences
Open original source ↗ ewh.ieee.org
Specific primary/official anchor · Professional engineering and technology ethics
Framework-level mapping: verify exact wording, institutional status, historical context, and scope before formal quotation.
Independent review pending. Edition XXI · Teaching Evidence · row 10615. Source publisher, date, translation and license have not been validated.
This edition does not supply a historical genealogy or coordinates for this teaching. Transmission, invention, population and geographic presence are not inferred from a mapping.
Shared systems in the corpus, not evidence of historical influence.
Place public safety, health, welfare, and environmental protection above convenience, prestige, or profit.
Communicate credible risks, defects, limitations, and hazards to affected people and responsible authorities.
Base estimates, claims, forecasts, and representations on available evidence without distortion.
| Primary Rank - Religious | 604 |
|---|---|
| Overall Rank | 593 |
| Nonreligious Rank | 454 |
| Religious Frequency Tier | 40 |
| Religions Sharing | 0 |
| Religious Systems | 52 |
| Religious % | 0 |
| Nonreligious Groups Sharing | 1 |
| Nonreligious Groups | 41 |
| Nonreligious % | 2.4 |
| All Systems Sharing | 1 |
| All Systems | 94 |
| Overall % | 1.1 |
| Direct Official Anchors | 1 |
| Direct Evidence % | 100 |
| Cross-Sphere Balance Index | 0 |
| Religious Adoption Gap | -2.4 |
Specialized or emerging teaching