Protect medical confidentiality after death
Continue protecting entrusted medical information after a patient's death.
An interactive atlas of moral teachings across the world's religious and secular traditions — from ancient scriptures to modern ethics.
Comparative atlas · Original English corpus · Evidence before conclusions
Find a teaching, follow its source anchors, and explore common ground without erasing differences. Every number describes only the systems represented in this edition.
610 teachings found · Edition XXI
Continue protecting entrusted medical information after a patient's death.
Do not exploit immigration status, recruitment debt, isolation, or document control.
Prevent violence, threats, coercion, and abuse by employers, recruiters, officials, or private actors.
Provide urgent medical assistance without discrimination based on migration or documentation status.
Respect family unity and the rights of spouses and children affected by migration.
Safeguard vulnerable cultural, religious, and social groups.
Do not undermine communities of ethical practice through exploitation, deception, or deliberate division.
Safeguard ecosystems, geological formations, habitats, and natural sites of exceptional scientific, ecological, or aesthetic importance.
Shield civilians and other nonparticipants from violence.
Prevent physical, psychological, sexual, financial, and institutional abuse.
Collect and use data lawfully, minimally, and securely.
Use heightened safeguards and permit interventions only under strict ethical and legal conditions.
Provide safe channels and protection against retaliation for good-faith reporting.
Respect each person's bodily and psychological integrity on an equal basis.
Avoid harmful substances and cultivate habits that support bodily, emotional, and spiritual well-being.
Allow diverse beliefs, cultures, identities, and forms of expression to coexist under equal dignity and law.
Do not intrude upon information or spaces without justification.
Use trained facilitators, informed consent, confidentiality, safety safeguards, and reviewable agreements.
Care for institutions and resources used by all.
Avoid unnecessary family separation and facilitate reunification where possible.
Provide safety to persons fleeing persecution or war.
Minimize risks, obtain ethical review, and protect vulnerable participants.
Respect burial places, ceremonial sites, and ancestral remains.
Use honest, transparent, independent, and best-available scientific knowledge in climate policy and public communication.
FIELD GUIDE · PURPOSE AND BOUNDARIES
World Morals is a source-oriented atlas for readers comparing moral teachings across religious and secular traditions. It provides ways to explore a finite corpus while keeping the difference between a recorded mapping and independently verified evidence visible.
↑ Back to the application
Choose a teaching or a system rather than beginning with a universal conclusion. Read its definition and source basis, then inspect the associated mappings. Open the source and methodology views to understand how a relationship entered the corpus. A label such as official source or specific anchor describes a record’s provenance category; it is not a substitute for reading the cited passage in context.
Use the comparison lab and matrix to formulate questions. Shared mappings may suggest a topic worth investigating, while differences may reflect wording, edition coverage or research gaps. Neither a checked cell nor an empty cell establishes what every adherent believes or how a whole society behaves.
Select a familiar moral theme and compare its records across two systems. Write down the source labels, what has actually been quoted and what remains a summary. Follow the source references before drawing a conclusion. Record a disagreement or missing passage as an open research issue rather than filling the gap with an attractive generalization.
For a classroom discussion, separate three questions: what the dataset records, what a primary text says, and how people interpret or practice it. The atlas directly organizes the first question. The other two need contextual reading, historical scholarship and, where appropriate, the voices of the communities being discussed.
The corpus is an edition with explicit scope and unresolved research statuses. Counts describe records and relationships, not moral superiority, global prevalence or the completeness of a tradition. Geographic and historical displays disclose where research is missing. English source material remains in its original language even when navigation and explanatory interface copy are Spanish.